(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 2".)
Here is the list of all my web pages from all servers.
These are arranged primarily by language
(i.e. as web pages in Polish,
English, German,
French, Spanish,
Italian, Greek, and
Russian.) For each language web pages are
arranged by their subjects.
Choose the page that interests you by dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking over there on
"Menu 4".)
In 1985 I was granted the honour of developing one of the
most vividly discussed scientific theories of present times.
This theory is called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
Everyone who familiarise himself with it, seems to take
towards it one out of two most radical stands possible.
Namely, either loves it and promotes it like his or her
own theory, or starts vigorously fight it out. This theory
displays a number of attributes, which in the same
configuration have not appeared in any other scientific
theory developed on Earth so far. For example,
(1) the correctness of it is supported by a huge number
of facts and phenomena which are already identified.
(2) It redefines completely almost all aspects of the
universe which surrounds us - becoming in this way
the "theory of everything"
searched for so long by everyone. (3) It explains,
clarifies, and makes understandable all phenomena
and mysteries which previously remained for us unexplained
(e.g. telekinesis, telepathy, ESP, animal instinct,
the existence and nature of the "other world", the existence,
evolution, and nature of God, the mechanism of feelings,
the work of acupuncture, the operation of human brain,
principles of generation of the so-called "free energy", morality,
karma, happiness, mechanism which governs weather
and climate, the origin of magnetic field and electrical
charges, energy, gravity, shape of the universe, etc., etc.).
Unfortunately, because of the breakthrough nature of
this theory, it encounters a very powerful resistance. In
fact, the gaining of recognition progresses for it equally
difficult as in past progressed the recognition of the
theory that the Earth is spherical, or later was progressing
the recognition of the Darwin's discovery that
God
utilises the gradual evolution for the continuous improvement
of the universe - means that God have NOT created everything
at once and in the final version of it. (As we know, even today
people do exist, who believe that the Earth is flat. There
are also people even today who believe that God created
everything in the final form, and that He did it in a single
impulse of creation.) Just because of this huge controversy
of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
and also because of the powerful resistance which this
theory encounters during the dissemination, I decided
to develop this web page. The goal of this web page is
to explain to the reader in simple words, what actually
this theory is, what benefits brings us learning it, and
how it explains the most significant phenomena which
surrounds us. (Of course, this theory explains much
more. But because of limitations imposed on the volume
of this web page, I am able to present here only a brief
summary of it.) In this way the web page allows the reader
to make up his mind about the merit of this theory on his
own, so that he or she does NOT need to relay in this
matter on mostly negative opinions which may be
stubbornly imposed on him or her by the sworn
enemies of this theory.
Please notice that there is a number of other
separate web pages, the topic of which have
a direct relationship with the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
In a more precise and more deep manner
these related web pages present various ideas which
originate from the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
or which have a cause-effect relationship with
this concept. For example, they describe the
philosophy of totalizm, moral field, moral laws,
karma, telekinesis, etc., etc. These related web
pages carry the following physical names:
"totalizm.htm",
"parasitism.htm",
"morals.htm",
"karma.htm",
"nirvana.htm",
"god.htm",
"telekinesis.htm",
"free_energy.htm",
"telepathy.htm",
"seismograph.htm",
"fruit.htm",
"healing.htm",
"humanity.htm",
"party of totalizm",
"propulsion.htm",
"magnocraft.htm",
"oscillatory_chamber.htm",
"hurricane.htm", and many more.
The complete internet addresses of the above web pages appear
in the addressing window of your browser, if you click on links to
these web pages, emphasized in the text with a green colour. In
turn their brief description is presented in item #J2 near the end
of this web page. Please recommend these web pages, and send
their addresses, to all these your friends and acquaintances, who
may be interested in learning the newest findings regarding matters
which are presented on them.
Part A:
Introductory information about this web page:
The name "Concept of Dipolar Gravity" is
assigned to a relatively new scientific theory
developed in 1985. This theory proves that
the gravity field belongs to a general category
of the dynamic dipolar fields, not to the static
monopolar fields to which the gravity was
categorised by the Earth science to date.
Therefore, in the light of this concept, gravity
is more similar to a dipolar magnetic field,
or to a dipolar field formed by liquids or gases
pumped dynamically through any pipe, e.g.
through the interior of our home vacuum cleaner,
than to a monopolar field formed by static
compression of e.g. air into tyres from our car.
In turn this qualifying of gravity into dynamic dipolar
fields, leads to a completely different than so-far
description of the design and operation of the
universe. This web page tries, amongst other,
explain how the universe governed by dipolar
gravity really looks like.
The development of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
started from my humble attempts to explain what
actually is this gravity field, what character it displays,
how it works, etc. In the result of these attempts, in
1985 I formulated an entire new scientific theory on
the subject of gravity field. It is this theory that I
named the Concept of Dipolar Gravity.
After I finished the development of this theory,
it turned out, that from just an ordinary scientific
theory, which only supposed to explain how gravity
field works, it turned out to be the
theory of everything
that was searched for so long. It seems to provide answers
to practically all questions that humans may have. In order
to give you some idea, as how wide range of questions
this theory answers, I suggest to consider the wide range
of key words and key phrases incorporated into this concept.
Amongst other questions, the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
also answered these very old ones (by the orthodox
science to-date considered to be unanswerable), e.g.
whether we have souls and spirits, whether God does
exist, how our brain operates and why we sometimes
remember things that happened before we were born,
how telekinesis, telepathy and acupuncture works,
what are feelings, what is "nirvana",
what is radiesthesia, what is energy, what is time,
how to build time vehicles, and many more.
Immediately after being developed the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity was published in a whole range
of publications. Thus descriptions of this theory
are available to interested researchers starting
from 1985 (means during the last over 20 years).
The most current publication of it is contained in
volumes 4 and 5 of the scientific monograph
[1/4]
entitled "Advanced magnetic devices".
(Notice that copies of this monograph [1/4]
can be downloaded free of charge via
menu or green links from this web page, and
also from other web pages listed in item #J2.)
Descriptions of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
are also available in Internet. One can find them
with "search engines" after using the name of this
theory for key words, i.e. after providing the words
"Concept of Dipolar Gravity".
This web page is another one amongst internet
publications on the subject. It is aimed at explaining
most important findings of this concept in a manner
that would be understandable for laymen.
Therefore this web page summarises briefly
most vital parts of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
for simplicity and in order to shorten presentations
removing from them almost the entire apparatus
of logical deductions and almost all evidence.
Unfortunately, after the removal of deductions
which explained "why" this concept arrived at
specific findings, and also after the elimination
of evidence which proves that these findings
coincide with the reality, the presentation of
subsequent explanations in a manner that
would NOT sound naive but still would be
understandable for laymen, turned out to be
extremely difficult. Therefore I would like to
notify readers here that this web page only summarises
what the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
determined and states. In turn to learn why
it states this instead of something completely
different, and also which evidence confirms this,
the reader needs to reach to volumes 4 and 5
of monograph
[1/4]
which contain the complete presentation of this
concept.
#A2.
How looks like and operate this dipolar gravitational field (i.e. the field described by the "Concept of Dipolar Gravity"):
We probably still remember this from classes
of physics, that there are two different kinds
of force fields. Their references usually use
names (1) a monopolar field, and
(2) a dipolar field. The first of these is
a static field, means it is formed in phenomena
in which force interactions appear while simultaneously
there is a complete lack of motion. In turn the
second one is a dynamic field, means it appears
in phenomena when it is the motion which
releases the action of any forces. Examples
of a static monopolar field is an electrical field,
and also a field formed e.g. after compressing
the air in a tyre from our car. In turn examples
of a dynamic dipolar field is a magnetic field,
and also a field formed at the inlet to our home
vacuum cleaner when through this cleaner
a stream of air flows. Each one out of these two
basic kinds of fields displays different attributes.
And so, for example the like "monopoles"
from a monopolar field always mutually repel
each other. It is because of this mutual
repulsion of identical monopoles that the air
from tyres in our car uses any opportunity to
escape, while objects charged electrically
push their charges onto the surfaces -
the consequence of which is that with the
elapse of time they gradually discharge by
themselves. But in dipolar fields is in opposite,
i.e. all objects subjected to the action of
a given pole of a dipolar field are mutually
"compressed" towards each other, thus forming
a dynamic pressure well known in hydromechanics
and described by the so-called "Bernoulli equation".
This compression of all objects on a pole
of dipolar fields makes an impression that
these objects mutually "attract" each other.
For example, it is because of this "compression"
of objects exposed to the action of a dipolar field
by a given pole, that a ping pong ball inserted into
a stream of water from a fountain maintains
hovering in this stream of water and looks as if
it is "attracted" by this stream of water. Similarly
is with the magnetic field, which makes an
impression that it attracts to itself all objects
susceptible to its action (e.g. ferromagnetic).
Of course, there are numerous further such
attributes unique for static monopolar
fields and dynamic dipolar fields - their
list is presented in subsection H1.1.1 from
volume 4 of monograph
[1/4].
If one analyses attributes which characterise
the gravity fields, then it turns out that all
attributes of gravitation coincide exactly
with attributes of dynamic dipolar fields,
and contradict attributes of static monopolar
fields. For example, gravity fields cause the
mutual "compression" of particles of matter,
which (the compression) makes an impression
as if this matter "attracts" other matter. But
it is only an impression, because the gravity
acts onto matter in exactly the same manner
as all dynamic dipolar fields act onto objects
susceptible to their forces. For example, the
same as onto matter, the gravity acts also
on different objects - e.g. on light (i.e. it is
known that a powerful gravity field bends
the path of electromagnetic radiation - as
is perfectly known and utilised e.g. in astronomy).
So both, matter and light subjected to gravity
display an effect which can be confused
with them being "attracted" - i.e. the effect
identical to the one which is experienced
by the ping pong ball hovering within a
dipolar stream of water from a fountain
and looking as of it is "attracted" by this
water. Means that matter behaves
totally opposite to the alike carries of
monopolar fields which always repel
each other (we can see this repulsion
e.g. amongst alike electrical charges, or
in particles of the air from tyres of our car).
The fact that attributes of gravity coincide
with all attributes of dipolar fields practically
means, that gravity is in fact a dynamic
dipolar field - in spite that the Earth's science
to date erroneously qualified it to monopolar
fields. So it is about time we repair this error
of science to date and qualify gravity correctly
to the group of dipolar fields.
If one accepts the evidence (which exists for long
time and is already well identified) stating that gravity
is a dynamic dipolar field, then one simultaneously
must accept the fact that the universe looks and
works completely differently than it was described
by scientists to date. After all, the to date description
of the look and work of the universe were worked
out and described for the highly erroneous
(non-written) fundamental assumption, that gravity
is a monopolar field. Since the scientific descriptions
of the universe to date were based upon such an
erroneous foundation, it is obvious that almost
everything that they state must also be erroneous
from the very foundations.
The first finding which hits our eyes immediately
after we recognise the merit of the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity, is that with the dipolar gravitation
the universe must be composed from two separate
worlds, similarly like in a vacuum cleaner there
are two poles for the air which flows through it.
(These two poles are the "inlet" for the air, and the
"outlet" for the air.) Our physical world
in which we live and which we learn with our
senses is just an "inlet" for the gravity. In turn
behind an invisible barrier there is another
world which is parallel to ours. The Concept
of Dipolar Gravity calls it the counter-world.
This counter-world is the "outlet" pole for gravity field.
Similarly as our world is filled up with matter,
also this other counter-world is filled up with a substance
which is appropriate for it. Only that this substance
from the counter-world must display attributes which
are exactly opposite to attributes of matter. The Concept
of Dipolar Gravity calls counter-matter this
substance from the parallel counter-world, which
displays attributes opposite to these of our matter.
Although the recognising the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity introduces a large number of this type
of shocking findings, just only the findings that
the universe is composed of two parallel worlds
(not just a single one) having a physical nature, which
are filled up with two (not just a single one) kinds
of substances having completely opposite attributes,
turns upside down everything that our science
to date, which is founded on the erroneous monopolar
assumption, tries to tell us. After all, such two-world universe
from the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, is more similar
to the one explained by religions, than to the one which
is being described by present physics or astronomy.
So let us read the rest of this web page in order to
learn a bit more of strange truths about it.
#B1.
Counter-material duplicates of physical objects, means "phantoms" ("spirits" or "ghosts") of these objects:
The Concept of Dipolar Gravity postulates,
that the universe must be composed of two
parallel physical worlds (i.e. "our world",
and the "counter-world"), the attributes of
which are to each other as attributes of
spaces that prevail at opposite poles of
magnetic dipoles. These two worlds are
separated from each other by impenetrable
barrier, while to each one of them an
opposite pole of gravity extends. Because
of the nature of gravity, which requires
that this field must always link some clusters
of substances, all gravity dipoles are
behaving as kinds of "marriage bounds",
which link with each other into
symmetrical pairs, all similar particles
of substances that prevail on both ends
of given gravity dipoles (i.e. substances
that prevail in both these worlds). In the
result, for every object that exist in one
of these two worlds, the gravity field forms
an identical duplicate that appears in the
second of these two worlds. Thus one of
the major discoveries of the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity, is the postulate, that all
material objects that exist in our set of
dimensions (i.e. existing in "our world")
must have their counter-material duplicates
that exist in the parallel set of dimensions
(i.e. duplicates existing in the "counter-world").
Actually the real existence of these counter-material
duplicates can already be conclusively
proven with our present technology by
showing them with the use of Kirlian cameras.
The best experiment which proves the
existence of counter-material duplicates
is the so-called "leaf ghost effect" described
by Daniela Giordano in subsection C9 of treatise
[7/2],
and also mentioned in item #D1 of this web page.
(In this effect the Kirlian camera shows the
shape of a counter-material duplicate of
a whole leaf, even if someone cuts this
leaf in half and puts on the camera only
a half of it.)
The fact, that according to the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity every material object existing in our physical
world has its own counter-material duplicate existing
in the counter-world, introduces for us immensely
vital consequences. After all, it realises to us, that
the dipolar gravity confirms exactly what we were
informed about by all religions. Religions for a long
time tell us, that independently from our physical
bodies, each one of us have also a "phantom" or
a "spirit" existing in a separate world. This "phantom"
is actually the counter-material duplicate of a given
physical object that is described here. The Concept
of Dipolar Gravity not only confirms the statement of
religions, but even extends and generalises it. It
explains that such a "phantom" (means such a
counter-material duplicate) exists not only for people,
but also for animals, vegetation, and even for objects
which so far were considered to be "dead" - such as
stones, furniture, cars that we use, computers, etc.
(If the reader does not believe that his car has its
own phantom, then I suggest to take this car into
a longer drive when the reader is in a bad mood,
while at a nearest opportunity to swear at the car
or, even better, to attack it with a hammer - and the
reader experiences what happens during this drive.
If one does not wish to risk just such a check, then
it is enough to recall in what mood one was when
one had the last traffic accident in his car, and
what one thought then about his car.) The
most extensive and complete descriptions of
counter-material duplicates from the counter-world
are contained in subsections I5.1 and I3.4 from
volume 5 of monograph
[1/4].
#B2.
Explanation of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
that magnetic field is a stream of circulating
counter-matter:
Physical attributes of counter-matter, such
as the lack of inertia or viscosity, cause that
this substance can be imagined as a hyper-active
liquid. This liquid continually forms various
circulations, streams, whirls, etc. - as more
comprehensively is explained on a separate
web page about the mechanism of formation of
hurricanes.
A simplest object known to us, which forms just
such a circulation of this extraordinary liquid is
every magnet. As this is explained by the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
every magnet is simply a kind of "fan" or
"vacuum cleaner" which creates a rotation
of counter-matter along closed circuits. Of
course, every magnet is linked by gravitational
interactions with the counter-matter which
it puts into the circulation. Thus, if two such
magnets are directed towards each other
with their like magnetic poles, then they
must mutually repel each other. This repulsion
is identical as the one that appears between
two fans which blow at each other. Only
that fans blow the viscous air, while
magnets "blow" the counter-matter which
is deprived viscosity and inertia. Therefore
two magnets mutually repel each other even
when they are directed towards themselves
with their "inlet" poles (I).
The explanation of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
that "magnetic field is simply a stream of
circulating counter-matter" has this consequence
that in fact in this concept every magnet has
two poles like a fan, namely an "inlet" (I) pole
and an "outlet" (O) pole. My research established,
that the inlet pole (I) of every magnet is this pole
which in the Earth's magnetic field is located
near the northern geographic pole "N" of Earth.
In turn the outlet pole (O) of every magnet is
this one which in the Earth's magnetic field is
located near the southern geographic pole "S"
of Earth. Therefore our planet Earth actually
works like a huge vacuum cleaner, as one can
appreciate by viewing e.g. polar lights (auroras)
or the ozone hole.
There is available a huge body of evidence which
documents the correctness of the above explanation
for the mechanism of formation of magnetic field.
A description of this evidence is provided in subsection
H5.3 from volume 4 of monograph
[1/4].
For these readers who like to touch and see the
evidence, one of the most tangible kinds of such evidence
is so-called "onion charcoal". It is described
and illustrated more comprehensively on a separate
web page named
evidence.htm.
This charcoal is formed in UFO vehicles in the result
of sucking organic matter by a powerful stream of
counter-matter circulated by propulsion systems
of these UFOs. Expressing this in
other words, because propulsors of UFO vehicles
always form extremely powerful circulations of
counter-matter, when these vehicles fly low
above the Earth, they act like powerful vacuum
cleaners sucking from the ground leafs, grass,
and all sorts of other light rubbish. In turn, after
sucking it, this organic matter is compressed
at the inlets (I) of UFO propulsors, and then
magnetically scorched. So during landings of
these UFO vehicles it sometimes crumbles
and falls down to Earth.
In a quite similar manner as the magnetic field,
counter-matter forms also electrical field.
Only that electrical field is not the circulation itself,
but a change of pressure of counter-matter caused
by this circulation. More about the mechanism
of formation of electrical field is explained in
subsection H5.1 from volume 4 of monograph
[1/4].
The mutual relationship between each
material object existing in our set of
dimensions (i.e. in our world) and its
counter-material duplicate existing in
a parallel set of dimensions (i.e. in the
"counter-world") can be described with
analogies or similarities between an
object and its mirror reflection, or with
similarities of computer hardware and
computer software, or differences between
the idea of 'body' and 'spirit' postulated
by various religions. Similarly like an
image and its mirror reflection, both parts
of an object are exact copies of their
opposite duplicate, and also they exactly
imitate each other's movements. Moreover,
both - the material object and its counter-material
duplicate - can also be independently
taken hold of and dislocated in space.
But because of the gravitational links between
them, independently of which part is grabbed
and dislocated first, the other part must imitate
exactly its motion. For this reason, depending
on which part of an object is grabbed first and
thus first dislocated in space, the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity distinguishes between two
different types of motion, named "physical
motion" and "telekinetic motion". A physical
motion occurs when the material part
of an object is moved first, whereas the
counter-material duplicate is pulled behind
it by forces of the gravitational links. In turn
a telekinetic motion occurs when the
counter-material duplicate is moved first,
whereas the material part of this object is
pulled behind the counter-material duplicate
by forces of their mutual gravitational links.
To illustrate this with an example, the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity shows that the telekinetic
motion is like forcing an object to move by
shifting its reflection in a mirror, so that this
re-located reflection causes the object to
move also. Of course in order for this
example to work in reality, light would
need to behave like gravity forces. The
other, even more illustrative explanation
for the telekinetic motion would be to liken
it to the "shifting material objects by
dislocating their counter-material 'spirits'".
The term
telekinesis
is a popular name for telekinetic motion described
here. Telekinesis have two main versions, namely
human and technical. A human version of
telekinesis usually is described by the term
"psychokinesis". Most frequently encountered
examples of it include telekinetic bending of
divining rods, and levitation. In turn technical
version of telekinesis most frequently is
manifested in the form of so-called "permanent
telekinetisation of substances", described in
item #F2 from this web page. Other source
of technical telekinesis are so-called
free energy devices.
In 1924 the great French physicist, Louis DeBroglie,
published the very important finding, sometimes
called "Principle of the Symmetry of Nature".
It states, that in our Universe everything is strikingly
symmetrical in many different ways. Some more
common manifestations of this symmetry are discussed
in subsection H6.1 from volume 4 of monograph [1/4].
For example, everything has an opposite of itself.
This means that every particle has its own antiparticle
(e.g. electron and positron, proton and antiproton).
Also every phenomenon must have its own anti-phenomenon.
The DeBroglie's "Principle of the Symmetry of
Nature" indicates a fundamental rule which is
in power for the entire our universe, namely that
"every phenomenon must have an appropriate
anti-phenomenon". So far a large number of
phenomena and corresponding counter phenomena
has already been discovered, which confirm
the correctness of this rule. For example, the existence
of electrical luminescence utilized in fluorescent
bulbs and in various light-emitting diodes to transform
electricity into light, has a counter phenomenon
in the form of the photoelectric effect that in photocells
and solar panels transforms light into electricity.
The so called "left hand rule", also called the
"motor effect", which describes phenomena
used for the transformation of electricity into
motion, has its counter rule in the form of
"Fleming's right hand rule", also called the
"generator effect", which works in reverse,
i.e. transforms motion into electricity. The
Seebeck Effect, which produces a flow of
electrons through a junction of two dissimilar
conductors being heated, has its counter
phenomenon in the form of the Peltier Effect,
which causes the heating and cooling of
materials in a similar junction when a current
is flowed through it. The piezoelectric effect
which converts the deformation of a crystal
into electricity, and which is utilized e.g. in
piezoelectric lighters to produce an igniting
spark, has its counter-partner in a phenomenon
which also is called "piezoelectric effect",
although it works in a reversed manner -
i.e. it converts the electric impulse into a
deformation of a crystal (this counter-phenomenon
is utilized for example in piezoelectric vibration
generators, and also in our quartz watches). Etc., etc.
If we find an exception to this DeBroglie's symmetry
of nature, it is obvious that its anti-partner still remains
undiscovered. Until 1985 one such an exception
was gravity field. However, the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity described on this web page indicated that
the anti-partner for the gravity field prevailing in our
world is hiding from us in the counter-world. Another
exception from the symmetry of nature was the
phenomenon of friction. Therefore the intensive search
for the anti-partner of friction was fully justified. This
anti-partner was revealed during the research on
the telekinetic motion. Namely, the phenomenon
of telekinesis turns out to be an exact reversal of the
phenomenon of friction (means telekinesis is an
anti-phenomenon for friction). In the exactly
reversed manner as the phenomenon of friction
spontaneously consumes energy of motion
to produce thermal energy (i.e. friction transforms
motion into heat), the phenomenon of telekinesis
spontaneously consumes thermal energy
contained in the environment of objects moved
telekinetically and produces motion (i.e. telekinesis
transforms heat into motion). This extraordinary
ability of telekinesis, to extract thermal energy
from the environment and transform this extracted
heat into motion, introduces immense consequences
for our energy production. After all, it allows to build
technical devices, which due to the release of technical
version of telekinesis will spontaneously absorb
thermal energy from their environment and convert
this energy into a useful form. Such devices are
popularly called
free energy devices.
Several their prototypes which already exist are described
on the separate web page that is devoted to them.
The spontaneous consumption of heat from the
environment during the formation of telekinetic
motion has several side effects. For example, it
causes that close to such technical devices which produce
telekinetic motion, rapidly becomes very cold. This
temperature drop can even be sensed, when the
telekinetic devices which cause it remain invisible
to us because they work in the "state of telekinetic
flickering" described in next item of this web page.
This is the reason why folklore states, that after any
"supernatural" being appears, always an intense
cold spreads over a given room. The second
consequence of telekinetic motion which hits
our eyes, is the appearance of an unique glow
which is called the "extraction glow". An
example of it is shown on photo from "Fig. #1".
These side effects which accompany telekinesis,
i.e. the temperature drop and the appearance of
the extraction glow, make possible for almost
every reader to complete empirical experiments
which are able to illustratively convince him that
the Concept of Dipolar Gravity is correct.
The technical version of telekinesis is relatively
simple for releasing. It is manifested every time
when the force lines of magnetic field are
accelerated or decelerated. This easiness
of triggering the technical version of telekinesis
turns out to be very promising in utilisation of
this phenomenon for propelling purposes.
It is possible to build space vehicles with magnetic
propulsion, almost identical to the one described
on a separate web page and called the
magnocraft,
which will be moved in space with the use of
the phenomenon of technical telekinesis. The
the Concept of Dipolar Gravity calls these
vehicles the "magnocrafts of the second generation".
The comprehensive description of these vehicles
is presented in chapter L from volume 10 of
monograph
[1/4].
Much more information about telekinesis is
presented in subsection H6.1 from volume 4
of monograph
[1/4].
In turn various technical implementations
of telekinesis are described in chapters L
and K from volume 10 of monograph [1/4].
To the description of telekinesis is also
devoted a separate web page named
telekinesis.
At this point it is worth to notice, that the sole
fact that telekinesis does exist in spite that
our official science based on erroneous
foundations of monopolar gravity was unable
to explain this phenomenon, is still another
evidence in a huge pool of empirical
confirmations which support the correctness
of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity described
here.
Fig. #1: The "extraction glow" emitted spontaneously by
all objects dislocated on principles of telekinetic motion,
which during their motion encounter an opposite force
that opposes their motion. This glow is like a "supernatural"
white light emitted from the space that directly surrounds
objects moved telekinetically. Means, it is emitted from
the space which looses the thermal energy extracted
spontaneously from this space by telekinetically moved
objects. This glow is very similar to a cold glow of the
Moon. In past it was considered
to be supernatural. On the above photograph it
is emitted from the space surrounding the divining rod
which was moved on principles of human telekinesis.
Such a "supernatural" extraction glow, together with the
temperature drop, are two most significant indicators of
telekinetic motion. Their appearance allows us for a simple
distinguishing between a telekinetic motion, and an ordinary
physical motion.
Extraction glow is generated when, according to the so-called
"Postulate of Interchanging Thermal Energy with the Environment",
described in subsections H6.1.3 and H1.3 of monograph [1/4],
the objects moved telekinetically must compensate their
consumption of energy through a spontaneous extraction
(conversion) of thermal energy contained in the close environment
of these moved objects. Therefore, the result of such rapid extraction
of thermal energy must be the fall of electrons in the atoms from
the affected area, down into their lower orbits. Quantum physics
states that such a fall of electrons into lower orbits must be
accompanied by the emission of photons detectable on a
sensitive photographic film as a kind of "extraction glow".
Thus the consequence of a telekinetic motion must be the
glow of atoms of matter which surrounds the telekinetically
moved object. The extraction glow appears not only in all
forms of psychokinesis caused by the human brain,
but also in the "technical" equivalent of this phenomena
occurring in devices which utilise telekinesis for their
operation. The most frequent subjects (and therefore also
the most easily available for research) utilizing the human
version of telekinesis (usually called the "psychokinesis"), are
dowsers whose success in searches for water is indicated
through the psychokinetic bending of their divining rods.
The above photograph illustrates the powerful extraction
glow which appears during such a bending. It was originally
published in two books by Christopher Bird entitled: [1FigH1]
"The divining hand" (1st edition, E.P. Dutton, New York 1979,
ISBN 0 525 09373 7, page 7) and [2FigH1] "Divining"
(A Raven Book, London 1979, ISBN 354 043889, page 7).
At the beginning of my research on the phenomenon of
telekinesis I also have taken my own series of photographs
of divining rods, capturing a weak extraction glow which
appeared on them. Although I managed to register cases
which were sufficient for proving that my theories are correct,
radiesthestists whom I photographed did not generate
as spectacular glows as the one shown on the above
photograph. My research revealed that individual dowsers,
similarly like individual healers, are able to generate
the human telekinesis of varying intensity. People able
to generate an effect with the intensity so high like this
one shown on the above photograph appear extremely
rarely. Further descriptions of the above photograph
are provided in captions under illustrations from Figure
H1 in monograph [1/4], and Figure L1 in monograph [8]
(all these monographs are available for free from
"Menu 2" on this web page).
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you may
use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged to the
size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
The mechanism of telekinetic motion differs
significantly in a whole range of aspects, from
the mechanism of physical motion. A very
significant one amongst such differences,
is that during telekinetic motion the moved
object changes its consistency from matter
into a kind of energy, or into a kind of a
non-material pattern. During this change of
consistency, the object disappears from the
view for a very small duration. After all, it exists
then exclusively in the form of energy, not in form
of matter. So during telekinetic motion a given object
is visible only at the starting point of this motion,
and then again after the motion is completed.
In turn during the course of this telekinetic motion
the object becomes invisible. Only that because
of the huge speed of completion of telekinetic
motion, the period of time for the duration of
which a given object becomes invisible to
human eyes is very short. However, this
period of time can be artificially extended
by its fast repetition, means through the
technical formation of an extremely unusual,
so-called "state of telekinetic flickering".
This "state of telekinetic flickering" is simply
a fast repetition of impulses of telekinetic motion.
These impulses are carried out so fast, that
the short durations of time when the object
subjected to the telekinetic motion changes
its consistency into an energy invisible to
human eyes, start to dominate the elapse
of time. Means, that the object subjected to
these impulses, is longer invisible than visible,
and thus it completely disappears from the
human sight. In fact, this state of telekinetic
flickering utilises exactly the same phenomenon
which causes that in our cinemas a sequence
of static frames on film becomes seen as a
moveable picture. Only that in the state of
telekinetic flickering the subsequent impulses
of telekinetic motion which cause that the object
disappears from the view are repeated usually
with huge frequencies of around 3000 Hz - for
details see subsection N5.1.1 from volume
11 of monograph [1/4].
(For comparison, the motion picture in cinemas
was formed in past with the frequency of flickering
amounting to around 24 frames per second, while
the picture in our TV flickers with the frequency of
50 Hz.) Such a fast repetition of these impulses
of telekinetic motion causes, that the solid object
subjected to these impulses becomes completely
invisible to human sight.
The state of telekinetic flickering has also this
attribute, that in the brief moments of time, when
a given physical object becomes energy, atoms
of this object can be shifted between atoms of
another solid object. In this way vehicles propelled
telekinetically are able to move through any solid
objects. All solid objects obstructing their way
behave then as if they are made of some strange
liquid, not of solid matter.
Much more information about the highly extraordinary
state of telekinetic flickering is presented in subsection
L2 from volume 10 of monograph
[1/4].
#D1.
Which evidence confirms the correctness of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity:
Already now accumulated is a whole ocean
of empirical evidence which confirms that the
counter-world definitively does exist and thus
that the Concept of Dipolar Gravity is correct.
Let us indicate here several examples of this
evidence.
People are, of course, the most convinced when
they can see something with their own eyes.
English saying goes that "seeing is believing".
As it turns out, the existence of the counter-world,
or more strictly the existence of the counter-material
duplicates ("ghosts" or "phantoms") formed in
the counter-world, in fact can be seen with
our own eyes. It is enabled by the so-called
Kirlian photography. It allows us to
see objects which exists in this counter-world -
but do NOT exist in our world. The most illustrative
pictures from this counter-world are formed
during the so-called "ghost-leaf experiment"
carried out with the Kirlian camera. In this
experiment, a half of a leaf is removed,
while the remaining half is placed on the
Kirlian camera. But the camera shows the
whole leaf. In a similar manner the Kirlian
camera shows pictures of whole amputated
fingers - the duplicates of which still are
present in the counter-world. (More about
this "ghost-leaf experiment" is explained
in subsection C9 from treatise
[7/2].)
In a visual manner effects of the existence of
so-called "whirls of counter-matter" from the
counter-world, can also be noticed on pools
of water formed after rains. Perhaps the reader
noticed at some stage, that after a rain forms
on the ground such pools of transparent water,
waves formed on surface of these pools disclose
rapid movements of something invisible inside
of these pools. These movements are not caused
by wind, because they appear and disturb the
pools with equal force also in windless days.
Besides, if one seeks them intentionally then they
can be seen in our bath tabs and in saucers with
water (even when water is hot). They are also
not any water creatures, because the transparent
water reveals that there is lack of any living
creatures in it. But still something
sporadically disturbs the surface of such pools,
causing the formation of trails on this water, similar
to these from invisible miniature powerboats.
This invisible something, that penetrates and
disturbs water after each rain, are so-called
"whirls of counter-matter". Huge versions
of these whirls cause hurricanes and tornados,
and also propel sea currents on Earth. These huge
versions are described on the web page about
hurricanes.
But independently from these huge ones, in the
counter-world also smaller versions of these whirls
do exist. They have diameters of strings and sizes
of e.g. elastics from underwear. It is the motion of
these smaller versions of whirls of counter-matter
through the pools of water that can be visually noticed
by us after every rain.
The existence of counter-world is also described
by almost all religions. After all, this is the same
world in which our ghosts stay. So another one
commonly known evidence for the correctness
of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity are relatively
agreeable with each other statements of almost
all religions in existence on Earth.
The existence of counter-world can also be
proven scientifically by analysis of behaviour
of force lines of gravity field. Namely, a wealth
of evidence confirms that force lines of gravity
field display a dynamic dipolar character, just
similar to the dynamic character displayed by
magnetic field. An example from this category
of evidence, is the "compression" force (by us
perceived as "attraction") exerted by gravity
not only onto matter, but also onto all other
objects, e.g. onto light - as explained in item
#A2 of this web page. So similarly like magnetic
fields, gravity also has two poles (namely
inlet "I" and outlet "O"). Only that in spite
of this dipolar character of gravity, in our
world we see only the first pole (i.e. the inlet
"I"). This practically means that the second
pole of the dynamic gravity field disappears
from our world and reappear in another,
parallel world. Unfortunately, because our
senses are located in this physical world,
we do not see what happens in this parallel
counter-world. This is a bit like with people
who swim in a sea. Because their eyes
remain above the level of water, they are
not able to see that under the surface of
water another underworld is hidden. But
the fact of the existence of this another
world is disclosed by the course of phenomena
which we are able to witness. After all, all
such phenomena, which are carried out
simultaneously in both worlds, must display
a dual character. And in fact, for example light
is already know to us from this dual character.
This duality of light is described by the coexistence
of the corpuscular and wave theories of light.
As it is perfectly quoted in the book [1H1.1]
by O.H. Blackwood and others: "General Physics",
4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973 page 665,
"Physicists have been jokingly accused
of believing in light waves on Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays and in photons
on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays".
{My own observation adds to this that "on
Sundays in churches physicists display the
complete negation of statements, which their
own physics is making to-date".}
Of course, not only the light shows such a duality.
For example, the theory on the "wave particle
duality of nature" states, that this duality is also
displayed by elementary particles, and practically
by all matter.
The greatest number of well-camouflaged
evidence for the existence of the counter-world
is contained in textbooks of physics.
Let us indicate here at least a single
example of such evidence. People who
know physics are tripping over it during
studies of electromagnetic waves. Namely,
as the reader probably knows, all waves
that exist in the entire universe subdivide
into two major categories, namely the so-called
"transverse waves" and the "compression or
longitudinal waves". The transverse waves
are created exclusively on the border of
two media - e.g. we can frequently see
them on the surface of the sea, or on the
surface of a waving flag. In turn inside
of a given medium exclusively compression
or longitudinal waves can propagate.
However, electromagnetic waves
display all attributes of transverse waves.
This means, that they must propagate
along the border of two worlds - i.e.
"our world" and the "counter world". So
if the counter-world would NOT exist, it
would be impossible to create transverse
electromagnetic waves.
One of the most spectacular pieces of evidence
for the correctness of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
which is already known by human science for a
long time, is this red shift of the light of
distant stars observed from the Earth. It is the
same "red shift" which the opponents of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity quote as their
"crown argument" for the supposed "escape
of galaxies" and for the "expansion of the
universe". Because of this contradictive situation,
that the same "red shift" is presently considered
to be a piece of evidence for the correctness
of two mutually contradictive scientific theories,
it is going to be discussed more comprehensively
in a separate (next) item #D2 of this web page.
Of course, in addition to evidence on the
correctness of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
listed above, volumes 4 and 5 of monograph
[1/4]
present a whole ocean of further evidence. In
order to name here at least some of them, they
include so-called "extraction glow" emitted during
telekinetic motion (see "Fig. #1"), ESP and animal
instinct - means the fact of communication of people
and animals with this thinking substance from the
counter-world, actual existence of phenomena of
telekinesis and telepathy, etc., etc. In order to learn
all these evidence, best is to read the entire
monograph
[1/4],
or at least read subsections H1.1, H5.3, I3.3,
and I7 from its volumes 4 and 5.
#D2.
The "red shift" in light of distant stars is the most noticeable scientific evidence for the correctness of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity:
I wonder whether the reader have ever noticed
the apparent differences between behaviors
of the waves on a river depending whether these
waves move along the powerful current of the
river,
or opposite to the direction of the current
of water. Although the real parameters of these
waves on a fast flowing river do not change, their
so-called "apparent parameters" become different.
After all, on these waves a phenomenon acts
in such a case, which is easy to check by
everyone, and which produces quite similar
outcomes to outcomes of the "Doppler Effect" -
although this phenomenon has nothing to
do with the Doppler Effect. Namely,
all waves which move along the
medium that is in the state of motion
with the speed similar to the speed of
the propagation of these waves, change
their speed of propagation in relationship
to a motionless observer in a manner which
is proportional to the vectorial difference
of speed of this medium in relationship
to the vectorial speed of these waves.
In turn this change of the speed of waves
in relationship to a motionless observer,
causes that this observer perceives them
as "apparent waves" of deformed parameters,
means waves which are just like a "model"
or a "picture" of real waves, and thus
which have changed length and frequency
in relationship to the real waves. The above
phenomenon is widely known on empirical
principles. However, in spite that I intensely
searched the name and description of this
phenomenon in textbooks of physics, as
so-far I have not found this name (perhaps
it awaits until it will be able to be called the
"Pajak's Wave Effect"). Of course, the
phenomenon described above clearly differs
from the Doppler Effect. After all, the Doppler
Effect assumes that the speed of light (or
other analyzed waves) remains unchanged
no matter what is the speed of the medium
in which this light (or other analyzed waves)
propagates. Therefore the Doppler Effect
relates exclusively to cases when the source
of waves is moving, while both the medium in
which these waves propagate, as well as the
observer, remain motionless, and thus when
the motionless observer sees the "real waves".
In turn the phenomenon described here
takes place when the source of waves is
motionless, while the waves propagate along
a medium that is in motion in relationship to
the motionless observer, and thus when
the speed of these waves is subjected
to an apparent change and therefore the
motionless observer sees the "apparent
waves" which display "deformed parameters"
in relationship to parameters of the real
waves.
At this point I should emphasize, that because
of this major difference of the phenomenon
described here and the Doppler Effect, their
perception by the motionless observer is also
completely different. Namely, in the Doppler
Effect the motionless observer sees the real
waves. Thus to whatever he sees the same
description and the same model of reality
applies, as to these real waves. For example,
both, what the observer sees and the real waves
can be described by the same equations.
In turn in the phenomenon described here,
the motionless observer sees "apparent
waves" - means like a different scale model
or picture of the real waves. Thus the relationship
between these real waves and these observed
"apparent waves" are like relationship
between a specific phenomenon, and a
model of this phenomenon completed in
a different dimensional scale and in
different conditions. Therefore for example
equations which describe real waves loose
their validity for the description of such
"apparent waves".
The phenomenon described in this item in a
best way is known to "surfers" who ride on
sea waves. This is because it is a source of
extraordinary phenomenon of "slowed-down
waves" which in English are called the
bore waves.
Such bore waves appear only in a few sparse
areas in the world. In these areas a combination
of parameters and configurations required for
the creation of such waves must exist, such
as the funnel-shaped river outlet, the correct
speed of the river current, the required depth
of water, the appropriate force and amplitude
of the sea tide which propels these waves, etc.
These "slowed-down waves" always have
the deformed parameters in relationship to
to the natural waves. For example, they move
much slower than the natural waves, sometimes
even standing still in their motion (i.e. they
significantly slow-down their frequency).
Simultaneously their length becomes shorter
from the length of natural waves. Sometimes
they become so short, that several of them
superimposes on each other, thus forming
a single huge "super-wave". Their behavior
does NOT fulfill the known equations for the
wavy motion. If they would be waves of light,
not waves of water, their observer would
see them as clearly "shifted towards red".
These waves always appear in areas where
the sea waves enter a river outlet and move
opposite to the current of water.
Such "slowed-down waves" are formed only
in several areas of the world, and usually
only once or twice a year - when the required
combination of conditions appears in there.
The most well known areas where these waves
appear include: the outlet of the Amazon river
(locally these waves are called there the
"pororoca"), Hangzhou harbor in China
(locally known as "Silver Dragon"), Solway
Firth w Scotland, Bay of Fundy in Canada.
One of the most interesting practical applications
of the phenomenon described above, is to provide
the explanation for the mechanism that causes
so-called "red shift" in the light from distant stars
observed from the Earth, and also the mechanism
which causes the "shift towards blue" of the white
light that falls on a given (e.g. our) planet and is
observed from the surface of this planet. This
explanation results from the definition of the
"gravity field" provided by the Concept of
Dipolar Gravity and described in item #G2
below. According to this definition, almost
everything in our universe, including light into
this number, is a kind of natural programs
which have the ability to move according to
the preprogrammed "laws". In turn the kind of
a force field similar to friction, that is formed
during the motion of these programs, is just
called the "gravity field".
So let us explain more comprehensively this
definition of gravity field provided by the Concept
of Dipolar Gravity. According to it, the gravity
field is simply a kind of "friction forces" formed
by the flow of a whole range of natural programs
which concentrically fall down from the cosmic
space onto a given heavenly body, then move
towards the centre of gravity of this body, to
finally pass in this centre of gravity to the other
world called the "counter-world". (The existence
of the counter-world is formally proven in item #D3
below.) In the result of this continuous flow of
natural programs, light (note that "light" is also
one amongst such natural programs) in the
vicinity of heavenly bodies always moves in
the fast flowing stream of these programs.
Therefore, if this light falls from the cosmos
onto the surface of a given heavenly body
(e.g. onto our planet), it is going to move
"along the current" of this stream of flowing
programs. Its speed thus must show then the
apparent increase in relationship to a motionless
observer from the surface of this planet. In turn
this apparent increase of speed in relationship
to a motionless observer is going to cause, that
the observer will see it in the form of an
"apparent light" - means the light which
"deformed" its parameters through apparent
extending its wavelength, but simultaneously
increasing its frequency. This in turn is going
to be manifested in eyes of this observer as
a "blue shift" of this light (means the shift of
the color of this light towards a blue color).
If in turn light is going to emerge from a
heavenly body, e.g. from a distant star, then
it will be moving "opposite to the current" of
this stream of natural programs. So it then is
going to show an apparent slowing down its
speed in relationship to a motionless observer.
In turn this apparent slowing down of its speed
is to cause, that the motionless observer is
going to see it as an "apparent light" - means
the light that "deformed " its parameters through
apparent shortening its wavelength but simultaneous
apparent shortening (slowing down) also its
frequency. This in turn will manifest itself in
eyes of a motionless observer as a "red shift"
of this light (i.e. the shift of color of this light
towards a red color).
#D2.1.
Why the "red shift" confirms the correctness of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
and contradicts the correctness of the "theory of the expanding universe":
Motto:
"Although the same phenomenon can be claimed a 'proof' by both sides which argue with
each other, in fact always are attributes present in it which contradict one of these sides."
It is a public secret that this "red shift" of the
light from distant stars becomes a key argument
for adherers of the so-called "theory of the
expanding universe". However, because
the theory described here and called the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity states an exact
reversal of whatever claim the adherers of the
"theory of the expanding universe", the same
phenomenon of the "red shift" in reality cannot
simultaneously support the truth of both these
contradictive theories. Thus there must be some
overlooked facts, and also various experiments
which can be completed, and which are going
to support the correctness only one out of these
two contradictive theories, simultaneously
certifying against the correctness of the other
one. According to my own research, the following
facts which are overlooked by adherers of the
"theory of the expanding universe" deny the
correctness of this theory, but simultaneously
confirm the correctness of the Concept of Dipolar
Gravity described here:
(i) All stars and galaxies display the "red shift",
while if the universe really expanded, a significant
proportion of them should display a "blue shift".
The point is, that this "red shift" could be observed
from the Earth in all stars only in case when the
Earth is located in the exact centre of the universe
(i.e. in the zero point). However, the Earth is located
on peripherals of the universe. Thus in case of
correctness of the "theory of the expanding
universe" only a part of stars and galaxies should
indicate the "red shift", while the remaining stars
and galaxies should indicate a "blue shift".
(ii) Apart from this "red shift" there are no other
facts that would support the correctness of the
"theory of the expanding universe", while there
is a wealth of evidence for the correctness of the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity described here - and
with it for the fact that the universe does NOT
expand at all. An example of just such
evidence is the fact described before that the
"sky is blue", although the earth's atmosphere
does NOT "implode" at all - means does NOT
shrink in the direction opposite to the direction
of supposed expansion of the universe.
Thus there must be another reason, unconnected
to the Doppler Effect, which causes this tendency
in shifts of colors. The physics tries of explain
clumsily the "blue sky" as a result of the phenomenon
which is completely different than the "blue shift".
Of course, it conveniently forgets then to check
experimentally, that the "red shift" of the light of
stars in fact displays mirror attributes to this "blue
shift" of the blue light from daylight sky.
(iii) Electromagnetic waves belong to the
category of so-called "transverse waves" (as
explained in item #D3 below) - exactly the
same as waves on water. Thus all phenomena
which occur in waves of water must also appear
in electromagnetic waves, and vice versa.
Expressing this in other words, the fact that
the phenomenon taking the form of the
so-called "bore waves" of water (described
in the previous item #D2) illustrates the watery
equivalent for the "red shift" in light from distant
stars, means that the present scientific
explanation for this "red shift" is entirely
wrong. Thus according to the DeBroglie's
Principle of the Symmetry of Nature, this
"red shift" of the light from stars is NOT
caused by the Doppler Effect of the escaping
galaxies, but by an ordinary motion of
electromagnetic waves "upstream" of
gravity fields of their own stars.
* * *
Independently from the above facts, which are
directly linked to the "red shift" discussed in
item #D2, also various other facts certify for
the absurdity of the "theory of the expanding
universe". Let us list here at least most vital
out of these other facts.
(iv) The configuration of the universe does
NOT correspond to the known explosive configurations.
Explaining this in other words, the universe is
filled up with matter in a "planned" manner" -
means as if someone intelligent (God) on
purpose distributed all the matter in a most
beneficial manner. In turn if the universe
originated from a "big bang" - as the
adherers of the "theory of the expanding
universe" claim, then it would need to display
the configuration which is characteristic for
an explosion. For example, instead of having
all the masses distributed in an intelligent and
approximately even manner, it would have
a whole mass clustered on peripherals. In
fact, if we even assume the phenomenon
of the "expansion of the universe" did occur,
then for the configuration of the physical
world that is already recognized by human
science, the mass of this universe would
need to continually flown out of a source,
or more correctly from a number of sources.
In turn such a continuous inflow of matter
is contradictive to the principles of "explosion".
In turn without an "explosion" which would
give the initial motion to masses, the universe
would NOT be able to expand. Summarizing,
the configuration of the universe and the
distribution of masses in it, suggest that
our physical world (this visible one) was
created intelligently, and has NOT
originated from an explosion.
(v) The theory of the "big bang" and the
expanding universe contradicts other physical
theories. For example, in the time of the
"big bang" the speed of the flow of matter
would suppose to exceed the speed of light.
But other theory (that of Albert Einstein) states
that supposedly the speed of light cannot
be exceeded - because the mass of matter
then increases infinitively. In turn we know
that the matter of infinitively large mass
no explosion would be able to neither move
nor accelerate. Means that we have a physical
paradox here, which can be solved only if
physicists begin to assume in their speculations
various unbelievable and unrealistic assumptions.
And all this improbable gymnastics and accepting
unrealistic assumptions is just to avoid the statement
that after all
God
does exists and God created the physical world -
as this is described and supported with numerous
evidence in item #I4 of this web page, and in a
separate web page about
evolution
(some matters linked to the creation of the world
and man by God are also discussed on the web
page about
time vehicles).
To summarize this item, the noisily promoted
"theory" about the existence of the "big bang"
and about the "expansion of the physical world",
turns out to be just a big "nonsense on wheels",
with which some fatalistic individuals try to scare
people and divert the attention of humanity from
the existence of God and from the researching
how God really created the physical world (see
item #I4 of this web page).
#D2.2.
Let us give life to the "Pajak's serpent" in order to explain simply a whole range of scientific paradoxes and puzzles:
Motto:
"If something displays manifestations of the existence, we need to name it in such a manner that we are able to talk about it freely."
When someone looks carefully into what on
one hand is stated by the official human science,
while on the other hand what emerges from the
real life, then hits in eyes the increasingly
wider discrepancy between these two.
For example, in the previous item #D2.1
is explained, that the life, empirical sightings,
and logics proves that so-called "red shift" in
light of distant stars is another evidence
for the fact that the physical world was
created by God as a stable stationary world.
But the orthodox human science insists in
erroneous claiming that the same "red shift"
of light from distant stars is a proof for the
"Doppler Effect" caused by the "escape of
galaxies". The science disseminates also
so-called "Murphy's laws" in order to explain
many strange events and paradoxes, although
is unable to carry out even a single repetitively
verifiable experiment in which the action of
these supposed "Murphy's laws" actually is
demonstrated. In order to be even more
funny, the orthodox science do NOT even seeks
a manner to prove that the ESP actually works -
in spite that in real life it is estimated that over
90% of natural resources and drinkable water
was discovered on the Earth just because of
the use of a divining rod or a pendulum assisted
ESP. I will not even mention here the stand of
official science in matters of UFOs or ghosts -
in spite that almost every newspaper overflows
from information on their subject.
All the paradoxes and inconsequence of science
can be diplomatically and collision free explained
if we give the life to some symbolic kind of existence,
which I would propose to name "Pajak's serpent".
After all, scientists are well known from ignoring
of the "Occam razor" and giving life to a whole
range of scientific creatures. And so, for example
the "Maxwell's Demon" helps the adepts of physics
to understand that so-called "laws of thermodynamics"
are not laws at all, but only statistic predictions
which in normal conditions usually come true.
In turn the so-called "Schrodinger's Cat" allows
physicists to explain why the observing of something
with the use of orthodox scientific techniques
disturbs the behavior of the observed object.
(Nothing though is disturbed e.g. by observing
with the use of
telepathic telescopes -
which perceive the information that every
object of the entire universe sends continually
about itself in a natural manner via telepathy.)
So following the above "spirit of the science",
herewith I am giving the life to another "scientific
creature" of this type. I call this creature the
"Pajak's serpent". It turns out to be
extremely helpful in a scientific explanation
of various paradoxes and inconsequence
which do NOT fulfill the known rules and
laws, and also in a scientific discussion
of various phenomena which exists objectively
but which the traditional name scientists are
afraid to speak loudly because these names
induce undesirable reactions in listeners
(of the kind, e.g. UFOs, spirits, souls, auras,
etc.). In addition, the introduction of this serpent
allows to eliminate double standards, when
the science states something completely
opposite to the statements of everyday life.
The name "serpent" I am giving to this existence
for reasons explained in item #E2 of the web page about
origins of evil on Earth.
In the mythology (especially Christian) the name
"serpent" was assigned to especially mischievous
supernatural creatures. It corresponded to a slang
swearing word "reptile", used e.g. in saying "a reptile
come out of him". These creatures were very
cunning, indescribably evil and ruthless, with
angry and hostile to people expressions on faces
and actions, extremely vindictive and mischievous,
had supernatural powers similar to powers of
devils, and behaved like present UFOnauts
(e.g. they used to abduct and harm people).
Therefore, to this new creature called the
"Pajak's serpent" are assigned all attributes
which characterized these folklore "serpents".
If one tries to define these attributes in a
scientific manner, then "the Pajak's
serpent is an elusive creature brought to the
life in order to facilitate scientific considerations
and explanations of various paradoxes
and discrepancies of empirics with theories,
which (the creature) is characterized by
a range of attributes and capabilities that
are unlimited negative contradictions of
attributes and capabilities of a moral
inhabitant of the Earth". For example
the "Pajak's serpent" always only does harm
to everyone around it, it falsifies results of
scientific experiments, it makes impossible
the taking of progressive decisions, it lives
forever, it has time vehicles - so it can shift
back in time or move to the future, it has devices
for listening to our thoughts, it has instruments
for an immediate hypnotizing people, it always
lies, it never does what it says that it will do,
it is extremely lazy and practices the philosophy of
parasitism,
it still lives in a system of slavery, it has no
"free will" - but only does what was ordered
to do, etc., etc. Furthermore, this ocean of
evil that the "Pajak's serpent" spreads over the
Earth is caused by it exclusively for
materialistic motivations of the lowest
grade. For example, it is extremely lazy -
so in order to release itself from the
need to work, it "abducts" people at
nights, then from the sperm and ovule
that it robs from these people it raises
a kind of slaves that it calls "biorobots".
Because it does NOT wish to loose time
at nights for sleep, during these abductions
it sucks from people their life energy with
the use of its advanced devices, and then
eliminates its sleepiness through regenerating
itself with this energy. Because it does NOT
wish to put effort into the development of
computerized "artificial intelligence", it
catches intelligent human souls and
imprisons them in own computers in
which these souls later slave for centuries
in roles of intelligent controllers. Etc., etc. -
for details of its "feasts" and "habits" see
descriptions from the web page about
memorial.
With the use of the "Pajak's serpent" which displays
all these attributes opposite to human ones,
it is very easy to explain all the paradoxes,
inconsequence, and deviations of present
human science from whatever happens in the
real life. For example, because of the lack of
capabilities for providing a scientific explanation
why someone caused so much evil to human
science and to humanity by proposing such
absurd and such harmful atheistic supposed-theory
as this claim about the "expansion of the universe"
and about a "big bang", while the only observable
fact which this atheistic supposed-theory was
based upon, is the "red shift" - such an explanation
immediately results from the "Pajak's serpent".
Namely, the "big bang" was forced onto the
science, and then promoted, by this "Pajak's serpent".
This serpent also explains how it is possible that
just such a single "supposed-theory" introduced
so many wrong ideas to cosmology and to
life, which now the Concept of Dipolar Gravity
needs so laboriously correct and repair,
and why the effect which explains it in
a simple manner and correctly, is still
ignored by the official physics and known
only empirically to e.g. "sea surfers".
In turn if someone ponders why the so-called
"Murphy's laws" work - although these laws
in fact do NOT exist, the explanation is
also simple - events described by these
laws are simply tricks played on people
by the Pajak's serpent. If someone ponders
why a huge majority of natural resources
is discovered by radiesthesia, although
the official science is unable to prove
that the ESP does exist - again the explanation
is provided by this serpent. This serpent simply
secretly falsifies results of official experiments
in ESP, so that the official human science
never is able to document the existence of
ESP. Etc., etc.
Of course the "Pajak's serpent" has the use practically
in all areas of science and technology, not just
in physics or cosmology. Wherever a paradox,
absurdity, bending of laws of the universe,
or a shocking discrepancy between claims of science
and the course of true life, does occur, all such cases
can be simply explained with the use of the
"Pajak's serpent". For example, in medicine it
explains why so large proportion of males
have back pains (the serpent takes a revenge
on them and pulls out their discs during
nighttime "abductions"). Why so large proportion
of women has the thrush of vagina - in spite
that they are sexually inactive (a male serpent
rapes them under hypnosis and infects them
with thrush). In biology it explains who and
why introduced theory of the so-called "natural
evolution", the truth of which is NOT supported
by even a single fact, while the knowledge
about the creation of the physical world and
man by God is ignored, in spite that the
truth of creation is supported by entire
ocean of scientifically undeniable facts,
a part of which is described on separate
web page about
evolution.
(For example, one of such undisputable evidence
for the creation of animals and humans by God
indicated on the web page about evolution is
the genetic code. The Shannon's "Theory of
Communication" scientifically proved that
every "code" or "language" must be developed
by someone who has an intelligence. In turn
only God could develop the genetic code -
for details see item #B3 on a separate web
page about
God,
which contains a formal scientific proof that
"God does exist".) In physics this serpent
explains why such large number of laws
and phenomena officially is forbidden
for research and for publishing, in spite
that about them there is a large volume
of evidence (e.g. consider the stand of
physics about UFOs, souls, spirits, auras,
ESP, etc.). In astronomy this serpent explains
why the "life-forms in cosmos" is searched on
most distant stars, while all the evidence that these
life-forms
already for thousands of years creep secretly
into our planet for robbery purposes,
is simply ignored. In matters of faith this
serpent explains why it is officially claimed
that there is no God, although there is both
a formal proof for the existence of God,
and also a wealth of evidence which consistently
confirms the existence of God (such evidence
in fact fills up the entire this web page).
In sociology and in politics it explains why
politicians, and increasingly larger proportion
of the society, avoids telling truth. Etc., etc.
When considering the operation of the "Pajak's
serpent" one needs to remember about attributes
of this serpent listed before, e.g. that it is extremely
lazy, that the Pajak's serpent practices the philosophy of
parasitism
which makes it to always do only what it is somehow
forced to do, and that it has time vehicles - thus
it has insight to future and knows exactly which
present events will act against it in the future.
Therefore the Pajak's serpent "plays its tricks"
not for everyone and not in every case. The
actions of it are selective and can be noticed
only when a given event exerts a powerful
influence on what is to happen in the future -
while in the interest of this serpent lies to eliminate
this influence. Therefore, for the actions of this
serpent one should NOT consider every fall of
a slice of bred with butter directed towards
a rug - especially if these falls obey laws
of statistics and physics. But if there was
an official verifying experiment being organized,
that would be later reported in textbooks,
while a number of slices of bread that fell
with butter downwards exceeded the
number that results from the prevailing laws,
then one would need to consider that the
serpent was at work and secretly "helped" these
slices to fell butter downwards. Expressing this
in other words, the "Pajak's serpent" sabotages
only these events which in the result of this sabotage
show later the discrepancy between what typically
happens in real life, and what is claimed by
official science or what people are ordered
to believe, and also vice versa - means
the interventions of this serpent take place when
events from everyday life rapidly begin to
deviate from the typical operation of laws of
the universe. To sabotages of this serpent are
mostly exposed people who do something
that is to impact strongly the future of humanity.
The philosophy of
totalizm
teaches us that to every human word a
three-dimensional luggage is attached.
Only the intellectual dimension of this
luggage contains the information what
a given word means. In turn dimensions
physical and emotional contain
non-intellectual messages. The goal of
these messages is to induce specific
reflections and reactions in our minds,
and to induce specific feelings in our
emotions, every time when we encounter
this particular word. It is because of this
emotional and physical luggage attached
to numerous popular names of what
medicine calls "penis", "vagina", or "bo"
("bowel open"), that medical disciplines
were forced to introduce their own terminology
which induces only medically desirable reflections,
reactions, and feelings. A similar situation is
with other areas of life, which the science has
a duty to research and to explain, but which
shamefully it ignores because to their popular
names of it is tied up just such a physical and
emotional luggage intolerable for the science.
So in order to include also these other
areas into the sphere of interests of the
official science, and this way to finish this
naming impasse, it is necessary to give
a scientifically sound name to these areas
that are ignored so-far. The name "Pajak's serpent"
is my proposal for solving this naming problem.
Up until now this name does NOT seem to
have any emotional luggage attached to it.
The bringing the "Pajak's serpent" to life and introducing
it to scientific deliberations creates several advantages
over the present manner of dealing by science with
paradoxes and inconsequence which trouble it.
(This dealing depends on "putting heads into sand"
and pretending that a given problem does NOT
exist.) This serpent allows to openly address problems
and to discuss them without indicating them by
unpopular names. From this is just a small step
to practical discovery who actually is this "Pajak's
serpent", what are aims of it, and with what methods
it acts - means to bringing to light all findings that
are described on web pages of totalizm (including
this web page) without steering widespread criticism .
Independently from this web page about the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity,
descriptions of the "Pajak's serpent" are contained,
amongst others, on my autobiographical web page
about me (Prof. Dr Eng. Jan Pajak),
as well as in subsection I2.1.2 from volume 5 of monograph
[1/5].
#D3.
A formal scientific proof of
totalizm
that the counter-world does exist,
formulated according to principles
of mathematical logic:
The first formal scientific proof for the
existence of the counter-world was
published in subsections H1.1 to H1.1.3
from volume 4 of scientific monograph
[1/4] "Advanced magnetic devices"
in 2000 (means quite a long ago).
In fact this proof was repeated three times
in the indicated subsections, each time
completed with a different physical methodology
of scientific proving. This in turn illustrates
that the scientific proving of so obvious
matter as the existence of the counter-world,
can be carried out not just on one, but
on many entirely different ways. The
scientific proof that "counter-world does exist"
is quite important. It confirms scientifically
facts which are explained to us by religions
for thousands of years. Namely, it proves
that this another world, popularly called the
"other world" (e.g. consider the saying "they
send him to the other world"), or "afterworld"
(e.g. consider the saying "he shifted to the
afterworld"), in fact does exist in an objective
manner. In turn this objective existence of
this world can be confirmed in a scientific
manner. From this in turn is just a small step
away from the scientific proving, that
whatever religions and folklore claim
about God living in this other world, and
about us going in there after our death,
is also an objective truth and can be confirmed
objectively with scientific methods.
The scientific proof that "counter-world
does exist" is for us equally binding as
all other scientific proofs - for example
as the proofs that the Earth is spherical,
or that sides of a right-angled triangle
fulfill the Pythagoras equation.
For our own good we should rely on
indications resulting from this proof
in everything that we do. After all,
if we do not consider it, then we
are to stick to views and undertake
actions which run against truth - means
which contradict the true operation of the
counter-world and the universe. In turn
thinking and acting contradictively to the
truth and to reality, inevitably brings
not very pleasant consequences to us.
In turn if we consider in our lives indications
resulting from this proof, then in almost
everything that we do, we are inclined to
make corrections for the existence and
influence of the counter-world on our lives
and on the world around us. This in turn
is the key to us reaping fruits and rewards
in the future, which await for these who
learned the truth and who recognize it.
During my professorship at a
Korean University
in 2007, by some strange act of
God
in the second semester which coincided
with the update of the fifth edition of my
most important monograph
[1/5],
I was granted the privilege of giving a series
of lectures from the mathematical logic.
A "by product" of these lectures was that to three
previous versions of the formal proof for the
existence of the counter-world completed before
with the use of physical methods, I could add
another version of the formal scientific proof
for the existence of the counter-world which
this time is completed with the use of methods
of mathematical logic. Because this proof
is short, I am quoting it below for the use of
these readers who would like to get familiar
with it, or wish to check the validity of it.
However, I would still encourage to reach
for further information regarding it, which is
provided in subsection H1.1.4 from volume
4 of the newest monograph
[1/5]
(currently still in process of writing).
The base propositions of the above proof for
the existence of counter-world stem from attributes
of so-called "transverse waves" - the
more
extensive description of which is provided
in previous items of this web page about
the
Concept of Dipolar Gravity -
see items #D1, #D2, #D2.1 above. But in
order to save the reader reading these other
descriptions, I remind here briefly that
every wave is simply a moving oscillation.
Thus in every wave two directions of motion are
coexisting, namely the main direction in which
a given wave moves, and also the main direction
in which occurs the oscillatory motion that forms
this wave. The "transverse waves" are simply
such waves in which the main direction of a
given oscillatory motion is perpendicular to
the direction into which the entire wave moves.
Most common examples of "transverse waves"
are waves on water.
The "transverse waves" must be clearly distinguished
from the so-called "longitudinal waves" in which
both above componential directions of motion occur
along the same line. A most common example of
longitudinal waves is probably a home toy in
which steel balls hang on strings in a row, like
pendulums, touching each other sideways. When
we lift a first of these steel balls and provide it with
a pendulum motion, then with the use this longitudinal
wave this pendulum motion is transferred onto the
last ball, which repeats it, then then the motion is
transferred back onto the first steel ball, etc.
So here it is, the entire formal proof for the existence of
the counter-world, completed with the use of methods
of mathematical logic:
Theorem:
"The counter-world does exist".
Basis propositions:
(1)
The electromagnetic waves display all attributes of the so-called
"transverse waves", and according to the present knowledge
the electromagnetic waves must propagate in exactly the
same manner as all known to us kinds of transverse waves
do propagate. All known kinds of transverse waves propagate
exclusively along the border between two mediums.
(2)
The belonging of electromagnetic waves to the
category of transverse waves which propagate
along the border between two mediums means
that in the space which these waves cross must
either exist a border of some sort between two
mediums which occupy our physical world, or
must exists a border which remains invisible to
our senses and undetectable to our instruments
and which separates our physical world and the
counter-world (the counter-world also remaining
inaccessible for us and undetectable for our
instruments) - each of these two worlds being
filled up with a different medium.
The fact that electromagnetic waves propagate
across space in which our advanced physical
instruments nor excellently provided and well
paid scientific laboratories are unable to detect
neither the existence of two different mediums,
nor detect the existence of a border between
two different mediums, eliminates completely
the possibility that electromagnetic waves could
propagate along a border between two different
mediums that fill up our physical world.
(Explanation complementing this set (2) of premises:
The cross-volume propagation of electromagnetic waves
researched by our science, occurring through the space
which for our measurement instruments appear as filled
up with an uniform medium, combined with simultaneous
behavior of these waves as if they propagate along the
border of two different mediums, may only then take place,
when these waves propagate along the surface of two
different worlds, means along the border of our physical
world, and some other world which remains inaccessible
to our senses and undetectable to our instruments, and
which is filled up with a different medium than our physical
world. Since this other world had no
scientific name so-far,
the Concept of Dipolar Gravity which discovered and
described it, named it the "counter-world".) (3)
The counter-world does NOT exist, or does exist. The propagation
of electromagnetic waves along the border between our physical
world and this counter-world eliminates completely the possibility
that the counter-world does NOT exist.
Proof:
(1)
The first basis proposition is to be transformed with
the use of tautological form of the method known
under the name of "hypothetical syllogism". This form
can be written as [(p =>q) && (q => r)] => [p => r],
in which the assertion "p" says "the electromagnetic
waves display all attributes of the so-called
transverse waves", while the assertion "q"
says "according to the present knowledge
electromagnetic waves must propagate in
exactly the same manner as all known to us
kinds of transverse waves do propagate",
in turn the assertion "r" states "all known
kinds of transverse waves propagate
exclusively along the border between two
mediums". The transformation of these
propositions implies the conclusion that
"the electromagnetic waves propagate
exclusively along the border between two
mediums".
(2)
Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion
in the next phase of inference, and using the method
of "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which
can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q, we obtain a
next conclusion which states that "the electromagnetic
waves must propagate along the border between
our physical world and the counter-world."
(3)
The last couple of propositions allows us to derive
the final conclusion with method called the "disjunctive
syllogism", the tautological form of which can be
written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q. In this form the assertion
"p" says "the counter-world does NOT exist", while assertion
"q" states "the counter-world does exist". Thus the final conclusion
states "the counter-world does exist"!
Conclusion:
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively
proves the truth of the theorem that "the counter-world does exist".
* * *
For the use of these readers who are NOT
familiar with the notation that is applied in the
above proof, I would like to explain that
symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent
"assertions" utilized in this proof as logical
variables. In turn symbols "&&", "||", and "=>"
mark logical operators "and", "inclusive or",
and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
It is also worth to mention about the validity of
the above proof. Because this proof utilizes
exclusively tautological forms of subsequent
methods, it remains valid for all values of
variables it uses. Thus practically it is error-proof.
If someone would like to undermine it, he or
she would need to undermine first the validity
of mathematical logic. In turn this logic is a
foundation for countless mathematical proofs
which with a large success were used by the
effective and precise discipline of mathematics.
Thus, since so strong proof for the existence
of counter-world finally we were able to develop,
it is worth to check now whether we live according
to this proof. After all, the guesses to-date
about the existence of the counter-world this
proof replaces with the reliable knowledge
and certainty of the existence of counter-world.
At this point I would like to appeal to other lecturers
of logic. Namely, I propose to take notice of the
lack of meaning, motivation, and the absence
of engagement in examples of proofs presented
in textbooks of logic - as an example consider
the textbook proof "modus ponens" of the kind,
quote: "Samson is strong", and "If Samson
is strong, then it will take a woman to do
him in." We can conclude
"It will take a
woman to do Samson in."
(End of quote.)
So instead in our lectures we use such
examples deprived of actuality and sense,
I would rather suggest for example of proofs
use e.g. the proof explained above, or the
proof indicated below. After all, these proofs
are to inspire students to thinking and to
searches for truth, give more sense to
their lives, will be agreeable with indications
of our conscience, and in a non-imposing
manner are going to add our own contribution
to the fight for the prevalence of truth.
The proving procedure presented above was also
utilized in three more proofs that are extremely important
for each one of us. Namely, it allowed to formally
prove that God does exist.
A formal scientific proof for the existence of God
completed with the use of methods of mathematical
logic, is presented in item #B3 of a separate web
page about the
secular and scientific understanding of God
and also in subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of the
newest monograph
[1/5].
The same procedure allowed also to prove that
people have ethernal soul - the appropriate
proof is presented in item #C1.1 of the web page about
nirvana.
Finally the same procedure allowed to formulate
the formal proof that God created the couple
of first people - the appropriate formal proof
is presented in item #B6.2 of the web page about
evolution<
